<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Artemis Financial Recruitment &#187; systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artemisfinancial.co.uk/tag/systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artemisfinancial.co.uk</link>
	<description>Financial Insurance Recruitment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>IFRS 17 to be more costly than Solvency II</title>
		<link>http://www.artemisfinancial.co.uk/ifrs-17-to-be-more-costly-than-solvency-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.artemisfinancial.co.uk/ifrs-17-to-be-more-costly-than-solvency-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2018 09:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hatty]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFRS 17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd's of London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solvency 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solvency II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artemisfinancial.co.uk/?p=1961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 2018 The overwhelming majority of UK insurers believe the incoming reporting standard IFRS 17 will be more costly than the Solvency II directive, new research has found. A survey of &#8230; <a href="http://www.artemisfinancial.co.uk/ifrs-17-to-be-more-costly-than-solvency-ii/">Find out more...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article-content news">
<div class="ContentEditor">
<p><strong>May 2018</strong></p>
<p>The overwhelming majority of UK insurers believe the incoming reporting standard IFRS 17 will be more costly than the Solvency II directive, new research has found.</p>
</div>
<div class="ContentEditor">A survey of senior insurance professionals by analytics firm SAS has found that a whopping 97% expect IFRS 17 to increase the complexity and cost of operating in the industry.</div>
</div>
<div class="element-columns-beta-outer">
<div class="element-columns-beta-inner">
<div class="element-column-left-beta-outer">
<div class="element-column-left-beta-inner">
<div class="element-column-left-beta-content">
<div class="article-content news my-page-content">
<div class="ContentEditor">
<p>Approximately 90% are preparing for costs greater than those incurred by Solvency II, with 93% predicting that the reporting standard will completely change their business models.</p>
<p>“UK insurers must not wait excessively for a clearly defined interpretation of what IFRS 17 compliance means,” SAS UK &amp; Ireland head of risk business solutions, Lee Thorpe, said.</p>
<p>“The changes are significant and will change the face of financial reporting. Insurers should be prepared to start planning and considering their options early.”</p>
<p>IFRS 17 takes effect on 1 January 2021, and is expected to usher in a significant <a href="http://www.theactuary.com/news/2017/06/ifrs17-to-usher-in-financial-transformation/" target="_blank">transformation</a> for insurance companies, encompassing all areas of financial reporting.</p>
<p>Despite insurers preparing for significant costs, it was found that 92% believe IFRS 17 will improve financial transparency, with 87% believing it is “crucial” to the survival of the industry.</p>
<p>Approximately 97% think the standard will result in improved processes and automation, while the same number believe it will help them modernise their financial systems.</p>
<p>Almost all said they are confident they will have achieved compliance before the enforcement deadline, with 61% already starting <a class="oLinkExternal" href="http://www.theactuary.com/news/2018/01/whopping-92-of-insurance-firms-unprepared-for-ifrs-17/" target="_blank">preparation</a> for the changes.</p>
<p>However, most insurers say their current systems are not up to the task and are preparing for major alterations.</p>
<p>Data management systems will experience the greatest upheaval, with 84% planning to upgrade or replace them, while accounting and actuarial systems will also see significant change.</p>
<p>“Insurers should adopt an iterative approach to compliance and 60% are planning a tactical strategy before refining the solution closer to the deadline,” Thorpe continued.</p>
<p>“Systems and processes with a strong emphasis on data management and governance will be crucial, and preparation for IFRS 17 may see the aggregation of existing data sources into one platform to centralise data.”</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.artemisfinancial.co.uk/ifrs-17-to-be-more-costly-than-solvency-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
